# Source paper archive

- Source title: Photosynthesis-derived carbohydrate supply sustains CuCl2-induced phytoalexin production in rice leaves
- Author(s): Naoya Misawa, Yumi Oshima, Tomohiro Sagara, Natsumi Tate, Shuhei Yoshinaga, Tomoko Sakazawa, Emi Yumoto, Hisakazu Yamane, Koji Miyamoto
- Source landing URL: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.29.761194v1
- PDF URL: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.29.761194v1.full.pdf
- PDF SHA-256: 3ef23c9f0f66ad83bff76d50dda9f48649603fd509bfeea905a4c2d019f68cc6
- Converter: pymupdf4llm 0.0.27
- Limits: Automated PDF text extraction; reading order, equations, tables and formatting may be incomplete or incorrect. Images are omitted, and no OCR was performed. Markup and links are neutralized for safe downloading. Consult the original PDF for the authoritative version.

---

&#91;bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.761194; this version posted November 2, 2026. The copyright holder for this&#93;(https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.761194)

preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
&#91;perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.&#93;(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)


1 **Title page**


2


3 **Photosynthesis-derived carbohydrate supply sustains CuCl** **2** **-induced phytoalexin production in rice**


4 **leaves**


5 Naoya Misawa &#91;a,1&#93;, Yumi Oshima &#91;b,1&#93;, Tomohiro Sagara &#91;a&#93;, Natsumi Tate &#91;a&#93;, Shuhei Yoshinaga &#91;a&#93;, Tomoko


6 Sakazawa &#91;a,c&#93;, Emi Yumoto &#91;d&#93;, Hisakazu Yamane &#91;a,b,d&#93;, Koji Miyamoto &#91;a,b,c,d,&#93; 

7


8 a Department of Biosciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Teikyo University, 1-1 Toyosatodai,


9 Utsunomiya, Tochigi 320-8551, Japan


10 b Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Teikyo University, 1-1 Toyosatodai, Utsunomiya, Tochigi 320

11 8551, Japan


12 c Department of Integrated Science and Engineering, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Teikyo University,


13 1-1 Toyosatodai, Utsunomiya, Tochigi 320-8551, Japan


14 d Advanced Instrumental Analysis Center, Teikyo University, 1-1 Toyosatodai, Utsunomiya, Tochigi 320

15 8551, Japan


16


17 1 These authors contributed equally to this work.


18 - Corresponding author.


19 E-mail address: miyamoto.koji.dm@teikyo-u.ac.jp (K. Miyamoto).


20


1


&#91;bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.761194; this version posted November 2, 2026. The copyright holder for this&#93;(https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.761194)

preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
&#91;perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.&#93;(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)


21 **Abstract**


22 Phytoalexins are antimicrobial metabolites whose biosynthesis is triggered by signaling activated by


23 both biotic and abiotic elicitors, but the physiological conditions that sustain their production remain poorly


24 understood. Here, we examined how light and carbohydrate availability affect CuCl 2 -induced production of


25 diterpenoid (phytocassanes and momilactones) and flavonoid (sakuranetin) phytoalexins in rice ( _Oryza sativa_


26 L.) leaf disks. Darkness strongly suppressed both the accumulation of all three phytoalexin groups and the


27 induction of their biosynthetic genes. In darkness, endogenous sucrose, glucose, and fructose declined to 3%–


28 8% of the levels in the light, whereas early accumulation of jasmonic acid and jasmonoyl- L -isoleucine (JA-Ile)


29 was not detectably reduced. Exogenous sucrose restored phytoalexin accumulation in darkness in a dose

30 dependent manner, together with the expression of the suppressed biosynthetic genes, whereas equimolar


31 mannitol had no effect. Glucose also restored sakuranetin accumulation in darkness but only partially restored


32 diterpenoid accumulation, whereas the glucose analog 2-deoxy- D -glucose did not, and it suppressed CuCl 2 

33 induced accumulation in the light in a dose-dependent manner. In the light, 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1

34 dimethylurea (DCMU), an inhibitor of photosynthetic electron transport, depleted soluble sugars and


35 suppressed phytoalexin accumulation, and sucrose reversed this suppression. Sugars alone induced little


36 phytoalexin accumulation, indicating that carbohydrates act permissively rather than as elicitors. Diterpenoid


37 phytoalexins depended more strongly on light than sakuranetin, yet both classes depended on carbohydrate


38 availability. These results indicate that photosynthesis-derived carbohydrate supply sustains elicitor-induced


39 phytoalexin production in rice leaves and largely accounts for its light dependence.


40 **Keywords**


41 _Oryza sativa_ ; Phytoalexin; Specialized metabolism; Photosynthesis; Sugar; Darkness


42


2


&#91;bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.761194; this version posted November 2, 2026. The copyright holder for this&#93;(https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.761194)

preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
&#91;perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.&#93;(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)


43 **1. Introduction**


44 Phytoalexins are low-molecular-weight antimicrobial metabolites that plants newly synthesize when


45 exposed to pathogens or other stresses (Ahuja et al., 2012). Rice ( _Oryza sativa_ L.) produces structurally


46 diverse phytoalexins, including the diterpenoids phytocassanes and momilactones and the flavonoid


47 sakuranetin (Miyamoto, 2026; Valletta et al., 2023; Yamane, 2013). Upon infection by the blast fungus,


48 diterpenoid phytoalexins accumulate earlier and to higher levels in resistant than in susceptible plants


49 (Hasegawa et al., 2010). Genetic studies further support their role in disease resistance: knockout mutants of


50 _OsNOMT_, which are impaired in sakuranetin biosynthesis, and of _OsCPS2_, which have reduced phytocassane


51 levels, are more susceptible to the blast fungus (He et al., 2024; Lu et al., 2018), as is a knockdown mutant of


52 _OsCPS4_ with reduced momilactone levels (Toyomasu et al., 2014), although an _OsCPS4_ knockout did not


53 show increased susceptibility in another study (Lu et al., 2018).


54 The diterpenoid phytoalexins are derived from precursors supplied by the plastidic methylerythritol


55 phosphate (MEP) pathway, whose genes, including _OsDXS3_, are induced upon elicitation (Okada et al., 2007).


56 Their carbon skeletons are formed by OsCPS2 and OsKSL7 for phytocassanes and by OsCPS4 and OsKSL4


57 for momilactones (Yamane, 2013). In contrast, sakuranetin is derived from the flavonoid pathway and is


58 formed from naringenin by naringenin 7- _O_ -methyltransferase (OsNOMT) (Shimizu et al., 2012).


59 Rice phytoalexin production is induced by diverse biotic and abiotic elicitors. Among these, CuCl 2 is


60 widely used as a reproducible abiotic elicitor, and CuCl 2 treatment rapidly increases endogenous jasmonic acid


61 (JA) levels in rice leaves (Rakwal et al., 1996). The requirement for jasmonoyl- L -isoleucine (JA-Ile), a


62 biologically active jasmonate, however, differs among phytoalexin classes: JA-Ile is required for sakuranetin


63 production but not for the production of diterpenoid phytoalexins (Miyamoto et al., 2016; Shimizu et al.,


64 2013). At the transcriptional level, Diterpenoid Phytoalexin Factor (DPF) and OsMYC2 regulate the


65 diterpenoid and sakuranetin pathways, respectively (Ishikawa et al., 2024; Ogawa et al., 2017; Yamamura et


66 al., 2015). Thus, the signaling and transcriptional networks that trigger phytoalexin biosynthesis have been


67 characterized in considerable detail. By contrast, the physiological conditions required to sustain these induced


68 responses, including the supply of carbon and energy for biosynthesis, have received much less attention.


69 Light is a major environmental factor affecting such conditions. Light influences plant defense


3


&#91;bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.761194; this version posted November 2, 2026. The copyright holder for this&#93;(https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.761194)

preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
&#91;perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.&#93;(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)


70 through multiple routes: photosynthesis supplies carbon skeletons, ATP, and reducing power, whereas


71 photoreceptors, chloroplast redox status, and reactive oxygen species also modulate defense signaling


72 (Kangasjärvi et al., 2012). In rice, phytochromes are required for JA- and salicylic acid-related responses and


73 for developmentally controlled resistance to the blast fungus (Xie et al., 2011). In _Arabidopsis thaliana_,


74 approximately 30% of strongly flg22-induced genes require light for their rapid induction, and inhibitors of


75 photosynthetic electron transport differ in their effects on this response (Sano et al., 2014). Because darkness


76 affects all of these processes simultaneously, a reduction in defense output in the dark cannot by itself be


77 attributed to carbon limitation. Combining light–dark comparisons with photosynthetic inhibition and sugar


78 supplementation therefore provides a means of evaluating the specific contribution of carbohydrate


79 availability.


80 In plant immunity, sugars act not only as sources of carbon and energy but also as signaling


81 molecules (Bolouri Moghaddam and Van den Ende, 2012). Carbohydrate availability can limit defense.


82 Repression of cell wall invertase impaired defense in tobacco source leaves (Essmann et al., 2008). Similarly,


83 starch-deficient _A. thaliana_ mutants showed reduced camalexin accumulation at late stages of _Colletotrichum_


84 _higginsianum_ infection and increased susceptibility, although the consequences of carbon limitation depended


85 on the infection stage and pathogen lifestyle (Engelsdorf et al., 2013). Sugars also act in the regulation of


86 chemical defense. In _A. thaliana_, glucose-6-phosphate modulates defense signaling, and basal sugar uptake


87 through sugar transport proteins (STPs) is required for normal chitin-induced camalexin production (Yamada


88 and Mine, 2024). These findings connect carbohydrate status to both the execution and the regulation of


89 chemical defense. They also caution against interpreting the effects of sugar supplementation solely as the


90 provision of biosynthetic substrates. In rice, sucrose has been implicated in the priming of defense responses


91 and in enhanced resistance to the blast fungus (Gómez-Ariza et al., 2007). Sucrose also preferentially induces


92 the expression of _OsWRKY7_, which encodes a transcription factor that directly regulates the defense-related


93 gene _OsPR10a_ (Tun et al., 2023). Sugars applied exogenously to rice leaves induce phytoalexin accumulation


94 (Nishimura et al., 2021). Moreover, soluble sugars, jasmonates, and flavonoid phytoalexins increase together


95 in strigolactone-deficient plants, and spraying glucose or sucrose increases jasmonate accumulation in wild

96 type seedlings (Lahari et al., 2024).


4


&#91;bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.761194; this version posted November 2, 2026. The copyright holder for this&#93;(https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.761194)

preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
&#91;perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.&#93;(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)


97 These studies establish that sugars can promote defense responses in rice. However, it remains


98 unclear to what extent photosynthetically supplied carbohydrates contribute to the light dependence of elicitor

99 induced phytoalexin production. In particular, sugar-induced activation of defense needs to be distinguished


100 from the capacity of supplied sugars to sustain an elicitor-triggered response when photosynthetic carbon


101 supply is restricted. It is also unknown whether diterpenoid and flavonoid phytoalexins, which differ in


102 biosynthetic origin and JA-Ile requirement, share such a dependence on carbohydrate availability. Here, we


103 examined CuCl 2 -induced phytoalexin production in rice leaf disks under light and dark conditions. We


104 quantified phytocassanes, momilactones, and sakuranetin, together with transcripts of their biosynthetic genes,


105 endogenous soluble sugars, and early JA and JA-Ile levels. We then used exogenous sucrose and glucose,


106 mannitol, 2-deoxy- D -glucose (2-DG), and the photosynthesis inhibitor 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1

107 dimethylurea (DCMU). These treatments allowed us to distinguish the contribution of carbohydrate


108 availability from osmotic and other light-dependent effects. We show that darkness depleted soluble sugars


109 without detectably reducing early jasmonate accumulation. Sucrose and, at least partly, glucose, but not


110 mannitol or 2-DG, restored phytoalexin production in darkness. DCMU suppressed phytoalexin production in


111 the light in a sucrose-reversible manner. These results indicate that an adequate supply of metabolizable


112 carbohydrates, normally sustained by photosynthesis, is a major determinant of CuCl 2 -induced phytoalexin


113 production in rice leaves and that sugar depletion largely accounts for its suppression in darkness.


114


115 **2. Materials and methods**


116 **2.1. Plant materials and growth conditions**


117 We used _Oryza_ _sativa_ L. ‘Nipponbare’ as the wild type in the experiments for Figs. 5D–F and 6G–I,


118 and ‘Nihonmasari’ as the wild type in the other experiments. Rice plants were grown using a composite soil


119 (Bonsoru No. 2; Sumitomo Chemical, Tokyo, Japan), under natural daylight in a glasshouse at Teikyo


120 University (Utsunomiya, Tochigi, Japan; 36.60°N, 139.88°E) as described previously (Inagaki et al., 2023).


121 The temperature in the glasshouse was maintained at approximately 28 °C during the day and at 25 °C at night.


122


123 **2.2. Chemicals**


5


&#91;bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.761194; this version posted November 2, 2026. The copyright holder for this&#93;(https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.761194)

preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
&#91;perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.&#93;(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)


124 Copper(II) chloride dihydrate and D -(−)-fructose were purchased from Wako Pure Chemical Co. Ltd.


125 (Osaka, Japan). Sucrose, D -(+)-glucose, and D -(−)-mannitol were purchased from Kanto Chemical Co. Inc.


126 (Tokyo, Japan). 2-Deoxy- D -glucose (2-DG) and 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (DCMU) were


127 purchased from Tokyo Chemical Industry Co. Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan). &#91; &#91;13&#93; C 12 &#93;-sucrose, &#91; &#91;13&#93; C 6 &#93;-glucose, and &#91; &#91;13&#93; C 6 &#93;

128 fructose were purchased from Omicron Biochemicals Inc. (South Bend, IN, USA). &#91; &#91;2&#93; H 2 &#93;-JA was purchased


129 from Tokyo Chemical Industry Co. Ltd. &#91; &#91;13&#93; C 6 &#93;-(−)-JA-Ile was synthesized from (±)-methyl jasmonate and


130 &#91; &#91;13&#93; C 6 &#93;-isoleucine and isolated by HPLC as described previously (Jikumaru et al., 2004; Riemann et al., 2013).


131


132 **2.3. Light and dark treatments with chemicals**


133 Leaf disks (6 mm in diameter) were punched from the youngest fully expanded leaves of 4-week-old


134 plants. For the quantification of JA and JA-Ile (Fig. 3D, E), leaf segments (approximately 1 cm long) were


135 prepared from the same leaves. Immediately after preparation, the leaf disks were floated on distilled water in


136 Petri dishes and incubated under continuous light (approximately 100 µmol m &#91;−2&#93; s &#91;−1&#93;, white fluorescent lamps)


137 or in complete darkness at 25 °C for 24 h to allow recovery from wounding. The disks were then transferred to


138 Petri dishes containing the treatment solution (0 h) and incubated under their respective light or dark


139 conditions until sampling. Samples designated "Initial" were collected at the time of leaf-disk preparation,


140 before the light and dark treatments were started. Sampling times are given in the figure legends. Leaf disks


141 were prepared from 3–5 plants and randomly assigned to treatments. For phytoalexins and soluble sugars, each


142 biological replicate consisted of a single leaf disk; 6 disks per treatment were incubated together in one Petri


143 dish.


144 CuCl 2 was dissolved in distilled water at 1 M as a stock solution and diluted to 1 mM with distilled


145 water. Sugars and 2-DG were dissolved in distilled water or in 1 mM CuCl 2 solution and applied at 0 h at the


146 following concentrations: sucrose at 3, 30, or 300 mM (Fig. 4); sucrose and mannitol at 300 mM (Fig. 5A–C);


147 glucose and 2-DG at 300 mM in darkness (Fig. 5D–F) and at 3, 30, or 300 mM in the light (Fig. 6G–I).


148 DCMU was dissolved in ethanol at 10 mM as a stock solution and diluted 1000-fold with distilled


149 water to a final concentration of 10 µM (final ethanol concentration, 0.1% &#91;v/v&#93;); 0.1% (v/v) ethanol was used


150 as the control. For DCMU treatment (Fig. 6A–F), leaf disks were incubated in 10 µM DCMU or 0.1% ethanol


6


&#91;bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.761194; this version posted November 2, 2026. The copyright holder for this&#93;(https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.761194)

preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
&#91;perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.&#93;(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)


151 in Petri dishes under continuous white light during the 24 h preincubation period. The disks were then


152 transferred to Petri dishes containing the same concentration of DCMU or ethanol, with or without 1 mM


153 CuCl 2 and, where indicated, 300 mM sucrose, and incubated under white light for a further 24 h (soluble


154 sugars) or 72 h (phytoalexins).


155


156 **2.4. Quantification of phytoalexins and jasmonates**


157 Phytoalexins were quantified as described previously (Miyamoto et al., 2016) with minor


158 modifications. Each leaf disk was submerged in 1 mL of 80% (v/v) aqueous methanol and extracted at 4 °C for


159 at least 24 h. Aliquots (1 µL) of the extracts were analyzed without further purification by liquid


160 chromatography–electrospray ionization–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-ESI-MS/MS; Agilent 6460 Triple


161 Quadrupole mass spectrometer with an Agilent 1200 separation module) equipped with a CAPCELL CORE


162 C18 column (50 mm long, 2.1 mm in diameter; Shiseido, Tokyo, Japan) in multiple reaction monitoring mode.


163 Phytocassanes A–E, momilactones A and B, and sakuranetin were quantified by comparison with the peak


164 areas of an authentic standard mixture (100 pg each). The amounts of phytocassanes and momilactones are


165 presented as the sums of the individual compounds.


166 For JA and JA-Ile, leaf segments (approximately 50 mg fresh weight per sample) were weighed and


167 homogenized in 80% (v/v) aqueous methanol containing 10 ng each of &#91; &#91;2&#93; H 2 &#93;-JA and &#91; &#91;13&#93; C 6 &#93;-JA-Ile as internal


168 standards. The extracts were purified on a Bond Elut C18 cartridge (100 mg, 3 mL; Agilent Technologies),


169 dried, dissolved in 0.5 mL of 50% (v/v) aqueous methanol, and analyzed by LC-ESI-MS/MS as described


170 previously (Miyamoto et al., 2016).


171


172 **2.5. Quantification of soluble sugars**


173 Each leaf disk was weighed on a precision balance (approximately 3 mg fresh weight) before


174 homogenization. The leaf disks were homogenized and suspended in 1 mL of 80% (v/v) aqueous methanol


175 containing 1 μg each of &#91; &#91;13&#93; C 12 &#93;-sucrose, &#91; &#91;13&#93; C 6 &#93;-glucose, and &#91; &#91;13&#93; C 6 &#93;-fructose as internal standards. The samples


176 were heated at 80 °C for 15 min. The supernatant was collected in a new tube, and then 1 mL of 80% (v/v)


177 aqueous methanol was added to the precipitate, followed by heating at 80 °C for 15 min. The second extract


7


&#91;bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.761194; this version posted November 2, 2026. The copyright holder for this&#93;(https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.761194)

preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
&#91;perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.&#93;(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)


178 was combined with the first supernatant from the previous step and centrifuged at 18,000 × _g_ for 5 min. The


179 supernatant was transferred to a new tube and evaporated to dryness under a stream of nitrogen. The residue


180 was dissolved in 1 mL of distilled water. The samples were loaded onto a Bond Elut C18 (100 mg, 3 mL;


181 Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA), which had been sequentially pre-washed with 3 mL each of


182 methanol and water, and eluted with 1 mL water. The flow-through and eluted fractions were combined, and


183 the sample was diluted 12.5-fold with 80% (v/v) aqueous acetonitrile. Sugars in the diluted samples were


184 quantified by LC-ESI-MS/MS using an Agilent 6460 Triple Quadrupole mass spectrometer coupled with an


185 Agilent 1200 separation module equipped with a Shodex HILICpak VG-50 2D column (150 mm long, 2.0 mm


186 in diameter; Resonac Holdings Co., Tokyo, Japan). The mobile phase consisted of water (solvent A) and


187 acetonitrile (solvent B). Elution was conducted at 80% of solvent B over 10 min at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min.


188 The retention times of sucrose, glucose, and fructose were 5.9, 4.5, and 3.8 min, respectively. All sugars were


189 analyzed in negative ion mode with nitrogen as the collision gas. Each sugar was quantified by multiple


190 reaction monitoring. Precursor-to-product transitions monitored were _m_ / _z_ 341/89 for sucrose; _m_ / _z_ 353/92 for


191 &#91; &#91;13&#93; C 12 &#93;-sucrose; _m_ / _z_ 179/89 for glucose and fructose; _m_ / _z_ 185/92 for &#91; &#91;13&#93; C 6 &#93;-glucose and &#91; &#91;13&#93; C 6 &#93;-fructose.


192


193 **2.6. RNA extraction and quantitative RT-PCR**


194 Total RNA was extracted from leaf disks using Sepasol-RNA I Super G (Nacalai Tesque Inc., Japan)


195 and subjected to cDNA synthesis using a PrimeScript RT reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (Takara Bio Inc.,


196 Japan). Quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed as described previously (Inagaki et al., 2023) on an


197 ABI PRISM 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) using Fast SYBR


198 Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems). Primer sequences are provided in Table S1 **.** Transcript levels were


199 normalized to that of the ubiquitin domain-containing protein gene _OsUBQ_ (Os10g0542200) and expressed as


200 relative values using the 2 &#91;−ΔΔ&#93; _&#91;Ct&#93;_ method.


201


202 **2.7. Statistical analysis**


203 All values are presented as means ± SE. The number of biological replicates is given in each legend.


204 Compounds that were below the limit of detection were treated as zero and are indicated as n.d. in the figures.


8


&#91;bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.761194; this version posted November 2, 2026. The copyright holder for this&#93;(https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.761194)

preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
&#91;perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.&#93;(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)


205 Comparisons between the light and dark treatments at individual time points (Figs. 1–3) were made using


206 Welch’s t-test with Bonferroni correction for the number of time points compared. Time points at which the


207 compound was not detected in both treatments were excluded from the analysis, and the number of


208 comparisons used for the correction was reduced accordingly. Comparisons among more than two treatments


209 (Figs. 4–6) were made using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD test on log(x + 1)-transformed


210 values. Treatments in which the compound was not detected were retained in the analysis as zero values and


211 are labeled n.d. in the figures. Analyses for Figs. 1–3 were performed with Microsoft Excel 2016 and those for


212 Figs. 4–6 with R version 4.3.1. Statistical analyses of transcript data were performed on Δ _Ct_ values ( _Ct_ of the


213 target gene minus _Ct_ of _OsUBQ_ ), which are on a log 2 scale, without further transformation. Differences were


214 considered significant at _p_ &lt; 0.05. Results of all statistical tests are provided in Table S2.


215


216 **3. Results**


217 **3.1. Dark treatment suppressed CuCl** **2** **-induced phytoalexin production**


218 To investigate the effects of light conditions on CuCl 2 -induced phytoalexin production, we prepared


219 leaf disks from rice leaf blades and incubated them under white light or in the dark. After 24 h under these


220 conditions, the disks were treated with 1 mM CuCl 2, and phytoalexin accumulation was followed for a further


221 72 h (Fig. 1A). The diterpenoid-type phytoalexins, phytocassanes and momilactones, accumulated under light


222 conditions but showed almost no accumulation in the dark (Fig. 1B, C). The levels of the flavonoid-type


223 phytoalexin sakuranetin were slightly but significantly higher in the dark than in the light at 0 and 6 h after


224 CuCl 2 application. However, the amounts at these points were less than 2% of the level reached in the light at


225 72 h. From 24 h onward, under dark conditions, accumulation was significantly reduced to 11%–25% of the


226 level observed under light conditions (Fig. 1D). These results indicate that dark treatment suppresses CuCl 2 

227 induced phytoalexin accumulation in rice leaves.


228 To examine whether the suppression of phytoalexin accumulation in the dark was accompanied by


229 reduced expression of the corresponding biosynthetic genes, we quantified transcript levels of four diterpenoid


230 pathway genes ( _OsCPS2_, _OsKSL7_, _OsCPS4_ and _OsKSL4_ ), the upstream MEP pathway gene _OsDXS3_, and the


231 sakuranetin biosynthetic gene _OsNOMT_ (Fig. 2). Under light conditions, all six genes were induced by CuCl 2,


9


&#91;bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.761194; this version posted November 2, 2026. The copyright holder for this&#93;(https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.761194)

preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
&#91;perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.&#93;(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)


232 although their kinetics differed: _OsKSL4_ and _OsDXS3_ peaked at 6 h and declined thereafter, _OsKSL7_ peaked at


233 12 h, whereas _OsCPS2_, _OsCPS4_ and _OsNOMT_ increased progressively until 24 h. _OsNOMT_ showed the


234 largest induction, reaching approximately 170,000-fold the initial level. At the time of CuCl 2 application, when


235 the disks had already been held under the respective light conditions for 24 h, transcript levels of all six genes


236 were below 10% of the maxima subsequently reached in the light, although small differences between the two


237 treatments were already detectable for four of them (Fig. 2A, C, D, F). Under dark conditions, the induction of


238 all six genes was markedly reduced. At 24 h, transcript levels in the dark corresponded to 0.8%–25% of those


239 in the light, and the difference was significant for every gene examined (Fig. 2A–F). At 6 h, the difference was


240 significant for five of the six genes, except for _OsCPS4_, whereas at 12 h it was significant only for _OsCPS2_


241 and _OsNOMT_ ; _OsKSL7_ showed a similar difference that did not reach significance after Bonferroni correction


242 (Fig. 2B). These results indicate that dark treatment suppresses CuCl 2 -induced expression of the phytoalexin


243 biosynthetic genes, in parallel with the reduced accumulation of the phytoalexins themselves.


244


245 **3.2. Dark treatment decreased endogenous soluble sugars without a detectable effect on early CuCl** **2** **-**


246 **induced jasmonate accumulation**


247 To examine whether the dark treatment limited the supply of carbon available for phytoalexin


248 synthesis, we quantified endogenous soluble sugar levels (Fig. 3A–C). At 6, 12, and 24 h after CuCl 2


249 application, sucrose levels were significantly lower under dark than under light conditions. In particular, 12


250 and 24 h after CuCl 2 application, sucrose levels under dark conditions had decreased to approximately 5% of


251 those under light conditions (Fig. 3A). At 24 h after CuCl 2 application, glucose and fructose levels in dark

252 incubated leaf disks were reduced to 3%–8% of those under light conditions (Fig. 3B, C). These results show


253 that dark treatment markedly reduced endogenous soluble-sugar levels in rice leaf disks.


254 Jasmonic acid (JA) and its biologically active form, jasmonoyl- L -isoleucine (JA-Ile), are among the


255 signaling molecules that regulate stress-induced phytoalexin production. We investigated whether endogenous


256 JA and JA-Ile levels decrease under dark conditions. Since the accumulation of JA and JA-Ile is induced early


257 after stress treatment, we measured their endogenous levels 2 h after CuCl 2 application. At 2 h after CuCl 2


258 application, no significant differences in JA or JA-Ile accumulation were detected between light and dark


10


&#91;bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.761194; this version posted November 2, 2026. The copyright holder for this&#93;(https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.761194)

preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
&#91;perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.&#93;(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)


259 conditions (Fig. 3D, E). Thus, the suppression of phytoalexin accumulation in darkness was not accompanied


260 by a detectable reduction in the early jasmonate response at this time point.


261


262 **3.3. Sucrose application restored phytoalexin production under dark conditions**


263 To assess whether the decrease in endogenous soluble sugar levels suppresses phytoalexin


264 production, we examined whether exogenously applied sucrose could restore it. Phytoalexin accumulation


265 after CuCl 2 treatment in the dark was suppressed, similar to that shown in Fig. 1. When sucrose was applied


266 with CuCl 2 in the dark, phytoalexin accumulation increased in a dose-dependent manner after 72 h of treatment


267 (Fig. 4A–C). The addition of 3 mM sucrose did not increase phytoalexin accumulation, whereas 30 mM


268 sucrose partially restored it. When 300 mM sucrose was added, the accumulation levels of all three


269 phytoalexin groups were not significantly different from those induced by CuCl 2 under light conditions,


270 although the mean momilactone level reached only approximately one-third of that in the light. We then


271 analyzed the transcript levels of the corresponding biosynthetic genes, _OsCPS2_, _OsKSL7_, _OsCPS4_, _OsKSL4_,


272 _OsDXS3_, and _OsNOMT_ (Fig. 4D–I), 24 h after CuCl 2 treatment. Under light conditions, all six genes were


273 induced by CuCl 2 . In the absence of CuCl 2, transcript levels of the five diterpenoid-related genes were


274 approximately 4- to 25-fold higher in darkness than in the light, whereas that of _OsNOMT_ was lower. Under


275 dark conditions, the induction of _OsCPS2_, _OsKSL7_, _OsCPS4_, and _OsNOMT_ was reduced, whereas _OsKSL4_


276 and _OsDXS3_ showed a similar tendency that did not reach statistical significance in this experiment. The


277 application of 300 mM sucrose together with CuCl 2 restored the expression of _OsCPS2_, _OsKSL7_, _OsCPS4_, and


278 _OsNOMT_ to levels comparable to those observed under light conditions. Treatment with sucrose alone had


279 little effect on inducing the expression of phytoalexin biosynthetic genes, except for _OsKSL7_ and _OsNOMT_,


280 which showed small but significant increases in the dark. However, these increases were less than 2% of the


281 level induced by CuCl 2 treatment under light conditions. These results indicate that exogenous sucrose restored


282 CuCl 2 -induced phytoalexin accumulation and substantially restored the expression of several phytoalexin


283 biosynthetic genes under dark conditions.


284


285 **3.4. Restoration was specific to metabolizable sugars**


11


&#91;bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.761194; this version posted November 2, 2026. The copyright holder for this&#93;(https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.761194)

preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
&#91;perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.&#93;(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)


286 We investigated whether the recovery of CuCl 2 -induced phytoalexin production in the dark


287 following the addition of sucrose was due to osmotic effects. Under dark conditions, 300 mM sucrose or


288 mannitol was applied together with CuCl 2, and phytoalexin accumulation was quantified. Phytoalexins were


289 not induced by the treatment of sucrose or mannitol alone (Fig. 5A–C). The addition of sucrose restored


290 CuCl 2 -induced phytoalexin accumulation under dark conditions, whereas mannitol at the same concentration


291 did not. These results indicate that the sucrose-mediated restoration was not due solely to an osmotic effect.


292 We further examined the effect of 2-deoxy- D -glucose (2-DG), a glucose analog that is


293 phosphorylated by hexokinase but is poorly metabolized beyond 2-deoxy- D -glucose-6-phosphate, thereby


294 interfering with glucose metabolism. In the dark, we applied 300 mM D -glucose (Glc) or 2-DG with CuCl 2 and


295 quantified phytoalexin accumulation after 72 h of treatment. Glc partially restored phytocassane and


296 momilactone accumulation under dark conditions (to 13% and 8% of the levels in the light, respectively),


297 whereas 2-DG did not; phytocassanes remained undetectable, and momilactone levels fell below those in leaf


298 disks treated with CuCl 2 alone in the dark (Fig. 5D, E). Glc restored sakuranetin accumulation to a level


299 comparable to that observed under light conditions, whereas 2-DG did not restore its accumulation (Fig. 5F).


300 The contrasting effects of glucose and 2-DG are consistent with a role for sugar metabolism in the restoration


301 of phytoalexin production, although inhibitory effects of 2-DG unrelated to glycolytic blockade cannot be


302 excluded.


303


304 **3.5. Inhibition of photosynthesis and treatment with 2-DG suppressed phytoalexin accumulation under**


305 **light conditions**


306 To investigate whether inhibiting photosynthesis can mimic the suppression of phytoalexin


307 production, we analyzed the effects of 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (DCMU), an inhibitor of


308 photosynthetic electron transport, on phytoalexin accumulation. Treatment with 10 µM DCMU reduced


309 endogenous sucrose levels to 13% and 6% of the corresponding untreated controls in the absence and presence


310 of CuCl 2, respectively (Fig. 6A). Neither glucose nor fructose was detectable under the assay conditions


311 following DCMU treatment (Fig. 6B, C). Next, we quantified phytoalexin accumulation following the addition


312 of DCMU. The addition of DCMU suppressed the accumulation of all CuCl 2 -induced phytoalexins


12


&#91;bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.761194; this version posted November 2, 2026. The copyright holder for this&#93;(https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.761194)

preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
&#91;perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.&#93;(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)


313 (phytocassanes, momilactones, and sakuranetin) to 5% or less (Fig. 6D–F). When 300 mM sucrose was added


314 along with CuCl 2 and DCMU, phytoalexin production recovered to levels comparable to those in CuCl 2 

315 treated leaf disks without DCMU (Fig. 6D–F). The restoration by sucrose suggests that reduced carbohydrate


316 availability contributes substantially to the suppression of phytoalexin production by DCMU under these


317 conditions.


318 We also examined the effect of 2-DG on phytoalexin accumulation under light conditions (Fig. 6G–


319 I). The addition of 2-DG dose-dependently inhibited CuCl 2 -induced phytoalexin accumulation under light


320 conditions. The addition of 3 mM 2-DG did not inhibit the accumulation of any phytoalexins. Instead, 3 mM


321 2-DG, like 3 mM glucose, significantly increased phytocassane accumulation (Fig. 6G). Treatment with 30


322 mM 2-DG significantly reduced the accumulation of all three phytoalexin groups. At 300 mM, 2-DG reduced


323 the accumulation of the three phytoalexin groups to 1%–14% of their respective controls. Under light


324 conditions, the addition of 300 mM glucose partially inhibited CuCl 2 -induced phytocassane accumulation but


325 significantly increased sakuranetin accumulation (Fig. 6G, I). Taken together, these results indicate that CuCl 2 

326 induced phytoalexin production is supported by an adequate supply of metabolizable carbohydrates, which is


327 normally sustained by photosynthesis under light conditions, and that the depletion of endogenous soluble


328 sugars is a major contributing factor to its suppression under dark conditions.


329


330 **4. Discussion**


331 The present study shows that CuCl 2 -induced phytoalexin production in rice leaves depends strongly


332 on light and that this dependence is largely accounted for by the availability of metabolizable carbohydrates. In


333 darkness, endogenous sucrose, glucose and fructose declined to approximately 3%–8% of the levels in the light


334 by 24 h after CuCl 2 application (Fig. 3A–C), and both the induction of phytoalexin biosynthetic genes and the


335 accumulation of diterpenoid and flavonoid phytoalexins were strongly reduced (Figs. 1 and 2). Exogenous


336 sucrose restored phytoalexin accumulation in darkness in a dose-dependent manner and, at 300 mM, restored


337 the expression of the biosynthetic genes whose induction had been suppressed (Fig. 4). An equivalent


338 concentration of mannitol did not restore phytoalexin accumulation (Fig. 5A–C). Glucose, but not 2-DG,


339 restored sakuranetin accumulation and partially restored diterpenoid accumulation in darkness (Fig. 5D–F). In


13


&#91;bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.761194; this version posted November 2, 2026. The copyright holder for this&#93;(https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.761194)

preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
&#91;perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.&#93;(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)


340 the light, DCMU depleted soluble sugars and suppressed phytoalexin accumulation, and this suppression was


341 overcome by sucrose (Fig. 6A–F). Together, these results support a model in which light, through


342 photosynthesis, maintains a carbohydrate status that permits CuCl 2 -induced transcription of phytoalexin


343 biosynthetic genes and the subsequent accumulation of their products, and in which the suppression observed


344 in darkness results largely from carbohydrate depletion.


345


346 **4.1. Light sustains phytoalexin production mainly through carbohydrate supply**


347 Light affects plant defense not only through photosynthetic carbon supply but also through


348 photoreceptors, chloroplast redox status, and reactive oxygen species (Kangasjärvi et al., 2012). In rice,


349 phytochromes contribute to jasmonate- and salicylic acid-related responses and to resistance against the blast


350 fungus (Xie et al., 2011), and light-dependent accumulation of sakuranetin has been reported (Ueno et al.,


351 2015). In this study, DCMU suppressed phytoalexin accumulation to 5% or less of the control under


352 continuous light (Fig. 6D–F). Because DCMU blocks electron transfer from photosystem II but does not


353 prevent light perception by photoreceptors, photoreceptor signaling in the light was not sufficient to sustain


354 phytoalexin production when photosynthetic carbon supply was restricted. Moreover, metabolizable sugars


355 restored phytoalexin production in darkness (Figs. 4 and 5), showing that light was dispensable when


356 carbohydrates were supplied exogenously. These two observations indicate that, in our system, the effect of


357 light on CuCl 2 -induced phytoalexin production is mediated largely through carbohydrate supply. However,


358 these observations do not exclude contributions from other light-dependent signals. DCMU also alters the


359 redox state of the photosynthetic electron transport chain, and in _A. thaliana_, inhibitors acting at different sites


360 of this chain differ in their effects on flg22-induced gene expression (Sano et al., 2014). In addition,


361 momilactone accumulation after sucrose supplementation in darkness reached approximately one-third of that


362 in the light, although the difference was not statistically significant (Figs. 4B and 5B). A minor contribution of


363 carbohydrate-independent light signals therefore cannot be ruled out, and photoreceptor mutants will be


364 needed to assess it directly.


365


366 **4.2. Carbohydrates act permissively, and their metabolism contributes to sustaining phytoalexin**


14


&#91;bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.761194; this version posted November 2, 2026. The copyright holder for this&#93;(https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.761194)

preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
&#91;perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.&#93;(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)


367 **production**


368 Exogenous sugars restored CuCl 2 -induced phytoalexin production but induced little on their own,


369 indicating that carbohydrates act permissively rather than as elicitors in this system. In darkness, neither 300


370 mM sucrose nor mannitol alone induced phytoalexin accumulation (Fig. 5A–C). Sucrose alone did not change


371 the transcript levels of four of the six biosynthetic genes, and the increases in _OsKSL7_ and _OsNOMT_


372 transcripts were less than 2% of the levels induced by CuCl 2 in the light (Fig. 4D–I). This contrasts with a


373 report that glucose, sucrose, fructose and maltose at 10 mM induce phytoalexin accumulation in rice leaves


374 (Nishimura et al., 2021). The two studies differ in leaf age, tissue preparation, light conditions, sugar


375 concentration and treatment duration, and the present data do not allow us to attribute the difference to any one


376 of these factors. Our results add that, once phytoalexin production has been elicited, its magnitude depends on


377 carbohydrate availability. This view is compatible with the involvement of sucrose in the priming of defense


378 responses in rice (Gómez-Ariza et al., 2007). Similarly, in _A. thaliana_, glucose and sucrose alone did not


379 induce the salicylic acid biosynthetic gene _PBS3_ but enhanced its flg22-triggered expression, whereas mannitol


380 did not affect flg22-triggered defense gene expression (Yamada and Mine, 2024).


381 Whether carbohydrates act as substrates or as signals cannot be resolved from the present data. The


382 restoration of transcript levels by sucrose (Fig. 4D–I) shows that carbohydrate status affects the expression of


383 biosynthetic genes, but such restoration would also be expected if transcription were constrained by energy


384 supply. In darkness, 300 mM 2-DG did not substitute for glucose and reduced momilactone and sakuranetin


385 levels even below those in leaf disks treated with CuCl 2 alone (Fig. 5D–F). In the light, 2-DG suppressed


386 CuCl 2 -induced accumulation in a dose-dependent manner, whereas glucose at the same concentrations did not


387 reduce sakuranetin or momilactone accumulation (Fig. 6G–I). Because equimolar glucose, which imposes the


388 same osmotic load, did not reduce sakuranetin or momilactone accumulation, the suppression by 2-DG cannot


389 be attributed simply to osmotic stress, and its graded nature argues against an abrupt loss of tissue viability.


390 Since 2-DG is phosphorylated by hexokinase, these results suggest that hexokinase-dependent sugar signaling


391 alone is insufficient and that metabolism downstream of hexose phosphorylation contributes to sustaining


392 phytoalexin production. At the lowest concentration (3 mM), however, 2-DG increased phytocassane


393 accumulation, as did 3 mM glucose (Fig. 6G). In _A. thaliana_, 0.5 mM 2-DG induces camalexin accumulation,


15


&#91;bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.761194; this version posted November 2, 2026. The copyright holder for this&#93;(https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.761194)

preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
&#91;perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.&#93;(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)


394 and its induction of defense-related genes requires hexokinase and STPs (Yamada and Mine, 2024). 2-DG


395 should therefore not be regarded as an inert analog: at low concentrations it may act as a sugar signal, whereas


396 at high concentrations its inhibition of glucose metabolism appears to predominate. Energy- and nutrient

397 sensing pathways, such as those involving SnRK1, TOR and trehalose 6-phosphate (Figueroa and Lunn, 2016;


398 Margalha et al., 2019), are possible candidates for linking carbohydrate status to the expression of phytoalexin


399 biosynthetic genes.


400


401 **4.3. Diterpenoid phytoalexins depend more strongly on light than sakuranetin**


402 Diterpenoid phytoalexins were more strongly dependent on light than sakuranetin. In darkness,


403 phytocassanes and momilactones accumulated to less than 2% of the levels in the light at 48 and 72 h, whereas


404 sakuranetin still reached 11%–25% from 24 h onward (Fig. 1). The same tendency was observed in the


405 independent experiments shown in Figs. 4A–C and 5A–C. Several observations suggest that sakuranetin


406 production is partly buffered against carbohydrate limitation. Although _OsNOMT_ transcripts in darkness were


407 reduced to 0.8% of those in the light at 24 h (Fig. 2F), sakuranetin accumulation was reduced far less, and


408 during the first 6 h after CuCl 2 application sakuranetin levels were even slightly higher in the dark (Fig. 1D).


409 Moreover, within the same experiment, 300 mM glucose restored sakuranetin to the level in the light but


410 restored diterpenoids only partially (Fig. 5D–F). Both classes depend on plastid-derived precursors: the


411 diterpenoids on the MEP pathway (Okada et al., 2007) and sakuranetin on phenylalanine produced by the


412 plastidic shikimate pathway, together with cytosolic malonyl-CoA; sakuranetin is then formed from naringenin


413 by 7- _O_ -methylation (Shimizu et al., 2012). The MEP pathway, however, consumes glyceraldehyde 3

414 phosphate and pyruvate together with energy and reducing equivalents (Vranová et al., 2013), and in darkness


415 chloroplasts depend on an external supply of ATP (Weber and Linka, 2011). This demand may render


416 diterpenoid biosynthesis particularly sensitive to carbohydrate depletion. Notably, the two classes also differ in


417 their requirement for JA-Ile (Miyamoto et al., 2016; Shimizu et al., 2013), yet both depended on carbohydrate


418 availability. Carbohydrate supply may therefore represent a common constraint on phytoalexin production that


419 operates independently of differences in jasmonate signaling.


420


16


&#91;bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.761194; this version posted November 2, 2026. The copyright holder for this&#93;(https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.761194)

preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
&#91;perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.&#93;(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)


421 **4.4. Carbohydrate limitation was not accompanied by a detectable reduction in early jasmonate**


422 **accumulation**


423 Darkness did not detectably reduce JA or JA-Ile accumulation 2 h after CuCl 2 application (Fig. 3D,


424 E), even though the leaf disks had been kept in darkness for 24 h before elicitation. Because CuCl 2 rapidly


425 increases endogenous JA in rice leaves (Rakwal et al., 1996), this observation suggests that the early jasmonate


426 response is largely maintained in darkness and that carbohydrate status acts downstream of, or in parallel with,


427 jasmonate biosynthesis. Consistent with this interpretation, carbohydrate dependence was shared by


428 sakuranetin, whose production requires JA-Ile, and by the diterpenoid phytoalexins, whose production does not


429 (Miyamoto et al., 2016; Shimizu et al., 2013). Transcriptional regulators of the two pathways, such as DPF for


430 the diterpenoids and OsMYC2 for sakuranetin (Ishikawa et al., 2024; Ogawa et al., 2017; Yamamura et al.,


431 2015), are possible points at which carbohydrate status could act. However, JA and JA-Ile were measured at a


432 single time point after elicitation with three biological replicates, and the mean JA level in the dark was 72% of


433 that in the light, a difference that this experiment could not resolve. Later jasmonate dynamics or differences in


434 jasmonate sensitivity therefore cannot be excluded. Spraying glucose or sucrose has been reported to increase


435 jasmonate accumulation in rice seedlings (Lahari et al., 2024). Our results do not contradict this; they indicate


436 that, under our conditions, the suppression of phytoalexin production in darkness was not accompanied by a


437 comparable reduction in early jasmonate accumulation.


438


439 **4.5. CuCl** **2** **elicitation is associated with depletion of soluble sugars**


440 CuCl 2 treatment itself reduced sucrose levels by approximately half, even in the light (Fig. 6A).


441 Whether this decrease reflects carbon consumption for defense or an inhibitory effect of CuCl 2 toxicity on


442 photosynthesis cannot be distinguished from the present data. In either case, elicited leaf tissues operate with a


443 diminished carbohydrate pool, and when photosynthetic supply is further restricted, this pool may become


444 insufficient to sustain phytoalexin production. This adds a physiological dimension to the concept that sugars


445 act as both nutrients and signals in plant immunity (Bolouri Moghaddam and Van den Ende, 2012), and to


446 observations that carbohydrate availability can limit defense in other species (Engelsdorf et al., 2013; Essmann


447 et al., 2008). In the field, leaf carbohydrate status fluctuates over the diurnal cycle (Smith and Stitt, 2007). Our


17


&#91;bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.761194; this version posted November 2, 2026. The copyright holder for this&#93;(https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.761194)

preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
&#91;perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.&#93;(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)


448 results raise the possibility that such fluctuations affect the capacity of rice leaves to produce phytoalexins


449 upon elicitation, a possibility that remains to be tested in intact plants and in pathogen interactions.


450


451 **4.6. Limitations and perspectives**


452 This study has several limitations. One concerns the generalizability of findings obtained using the


453 present experimental system. We used detached leaf disks, in which source–sink relationships are disrupted


454 and wounding may interact with elicitation. Whether the present findings extend to intact plants remains to be


455 determined. In addition, CuCl 2 is an abiotic elicitor, and it remains to be tested whether the same carbohydrate


456 dependence applies to responses induced by pathogens or by microbe-associated molecular patterns.


457 Continuous light and continuous darkness represent extreme conditions compared with natural diurnal cycles.


458 Prolonged darkness of detached leaf disks may induce starvation- and senescence-related responses, as


459 suggested by the elevated basal transcript levels of diterpenoid biosynthetic genes in darkness (Figs. 2 and 4).


460 The carbohydrate-manipulation experiments also require cautious interpretation. The 300 mM sugar


461 concentration used in the restoration experiments exceeds physiological levels. However, this concentration


462 has been used in studies of sucrose-induced defense priming in rice (Gómez-Ariza et al., 2007). Moreover,


463 equimolar mannitol did not reproduce the effect of sucrose (Fig. 5A–C), and sucrose restored phytoalexin


464 production in a dose-dependent manner over the range of 3–300 mM (Fig. 4A–C). Nevertheless, high sugar


465 concentrations may themselves influence phytoalexin production: 300 mM glucose moderately reduced


466 phytocassane accumulation in the light (Fig. 6G). Furthermore, endogenous sugar levels after supplementation


467 were not measured. DCMU and 2-DG may also have effects other than those intended; for example, 2-DG can


468 interfere with protein _N_ -glycosylation and sequester phosphate as 2-DG-6-phosphate.


469 Further constraints concern comparisons across experiments and parameters that were not measured.


470 The glucose and 2-DG experiments were performed with ‘Nipponbare’, whereas the remaining experiments


471 used ‘Nihonmasari’. Absolute phytoalexin levels also varied among independent experiments, potentially


472 reflecting differences in cultivar and plant growth conditions. We therefore restricted comparisons to


473 treatments and their corresponding controls within each experiment. We did not assess tissue viability or


474 copper uptake. In one experiment, CuCl 2 slightly reduced the already low basal levels of diterpenoid


18


&#91;bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.761194; this version posted November 2, 2026. The copyright holder for this&#93;(https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.761194)

preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
&#91;perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.&#93;(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)


475 phytoalexins in darkness (Fig. 5D, E), and light-dependent differences in copper toxicity cannot be excluded.


476 However, sucrose restored CuCl 2 -induced phytoalexin production in darkness, arguing against irreversible


477 tissue damage as the sole explanation. Gene expression was analyzed in the dark–sucrose system but not in the


478 DCMU experiments, in which the effects of DCMU were assessed only at the metabolite level.


479 Future studies using photoreceptor mutants and mutants affected in starch metabolism or sugar


480 transport, together with direct measurements of cellular energy status, will help clarify how carbohydrate


481 availability is translated into phytoalexin production.


482


483 **5. Conclusions**


484 CuCl 2 -induced phytoalexin production in rice leaves was strongly suppressed in darkness, and this


485 suppression was accompanied by depletion of soluble sugars but not by a detectable reduction in early


486 jasmonate accumulation. Metabolizable sugars, but not mannitol or 2-DG, restored phytoalexin production in


487 darkness, and inhibition of photosynthesis by DCMU reproduced the suppression in the light in a sucrose

488 reversible manner. These findings indicate that photosynthesis-derived carbohydrate supply sustains the


489 production of both diterpenoid and flavonoid phytoalexins in rice and is a major determinant of its light


490 dependence.


491


492 **CRediT authorship contribution statement**


493 Naoya Misawa: Formal analysis, Investigation, Visualization, Writing – review &amp; editing.


494 Yumi Oshima: Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Writing – review &amp; editing.


495 Tomohiro Sagara: Investigation, Formal analysis.


496 Natsumi Tate: Investigation, Formal analysis.


497 Shuhei Yoshinaga: Investigation, Formal analysis.


498 Tomoko Sakazawa: Investigation.


499 Emi Yumoto: Investigation, Methodology, Formal analysis.


500 Hisakazu Yamane: Conceptualization, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review &amp; editing, Funding


501 acquisition.


19


&#91;bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.761194; this version posted November 2, 2026. The copyright holder for this&#93;(https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.761194)

preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
&#91;perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.&#93;(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)


502 Koji Miyamoto: Conceptualization, Data curation, Methodology, Formal analysis, Resources, Visualization,


503 Writing – original draft, Writing – review &amp; editing, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition.


504


505 **Funding**


506 This work was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI


507 (JP18K14399 to K.M. and JP16K07722 to H.Y.); the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and


508 Technology-Supported Program for the Strategic Research Foundation at Private Universities (S131052A01 to


509 H.Y.); the Advanced Comprehensive Research Organization (ACRO) Research Grants of Teikyo University


510 (TeTe20-01 to K.M.); and the ACRO Incubation Grants of Teikyo University (25-137 to K.M.).


511


512 **Declaration of competing interests**


513 The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as


514 potential competing interests: Koji Miyamoto reports financial support was provided by Japan Society for the


515 Promotion of Science. Hisakazu Yamane reports financial support was provided by Japan Society for the


516 Promotion of Science. Hisakazu Yamane reports financial support was provided by Government of Japan


517 Ministry of Education Culture Sports Science and Technology. If there are other authors, they declare that they


518 have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence


519 the work reported in this paper.


520


521 **Acknowledgements**


522 We thank Dr. Tomoko Shinomura (formerly of Teikyo University) and Dr. Eiichi Minami (formerly


523 of the National Agriculture and Food Research Organization) for valuable advice on this study, Emeritus


524 Professor Moritoshi Iino (Osaka City University, now Osaka Metropolitan University) for providing seeds of


525 rice ‘Nihonmasari’, and Shota Abe (Teikyo University) for technical assistance.


526


527 **Declaration of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the manuscript preparation process**


528 During the preparation of this work, the authors used Claude (Anthropic), DeepL (DeepL SE), and


20


&#91;bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.761194; this version posted November 2, 2026. The copyright holder for this&#93;(https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.761194)

preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
&#91;perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.&#93;(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)


529 Perplexity (Perplexity AI) to draft, translate, and revise the English text and to assist with literature searches,


530 and Claude and Perplexity to generate R code for statistical analyses and to check the consistency of statistical


531 results. After using these tools, the authors reviewed and edited the content, verified the cited sources and the


532 analysis outputs, and take full responsibility for the content of the published article.


533


534 **Data availability**


535 The complete results of the statistical analyses are provided in Table S2. Raw data are available from


536 the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


537


21


&#91;bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.761194; this version posted November 2, 2026. The copyright holder for this&#93;(https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.761194)

preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
&#91;perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.&#93;(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)


538 **References**


539 Ahuja, I., Kissen, R., Bones, A.M., 2012. Phytoalexins in defense against pathogens. Trends Plant Sci. 17, 73–


540 90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2011.11.002


541 Bolouri Moghaddam, M.R., Van den Ende, W., 2012. Sugars and plant innate immunity. J. Exp. Bot. 63,


542 3989–3998. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ers129


543 Engelsdorf, T., Horst, R.J., Pröls, R., Pröschel, M., Dietz, F., Hückelhoven, R., Voll, L.M., 2013. Reduced


544 carbohydrate availability enhances the susceptibility of Arabidopsis toward Colletotrichum


545 higginsianum. Plant Physiol. 162, 225–238. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.112.209676


546 Essmann, J., Schmitz-Thom, I., Schön, H., Sonnewald, S., Weis, E., Scharte, J., 2008. RNA interference

547 mediated repression of cell wall invertase impairs defense in source leaves of tobacco. Plant Physiol.


548 147, 1288–1299. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.108.121418


549 Figueroa, C.M., Lunn, J.E., 2016. A tale of two sugars: Trehalose 6-phosphate and sucrose. Plant Physiol. 172,


550 7–27. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.16.00417


551 Gómez-Ariza, J., Campo, S., Rufat, M., Estopà, M., Messeguer, J., San Segundo, B., Coca, M., 2007. Sucrose

552 mediated priming of plant defense responses and broad-spectrum disease resistance by overexpression


553 of the maize pathogenesis-related PRms protein in rice plants. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 20, 832–


554 842. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-20-7-0832


555 Hasegawa, M., Mitsuhara, I., Seo, S., Imai, T., Koga, J., Okada, K., Yamane, H., Ohashi, Y., 2010.


556 Phytoalexin accumulation in the interaction between rice and the blast fungus. Mol. Plant Microbe


557 Interact. 23, 1000–1011. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-23-8-1000


558 He, Y., Zhao, Y., Hu, J., Wang, L., Li, L., Zhang, X., Zhou, Z., Chen, L., Wang, H., Wang, J., Hong, G., 2024.


559 The OsBZR1-OsSPX1/2 module fine-tunes the growth-immunity trade-off in adaptation to phosphate


560 availability in rice. Mol. Plant 17, 258–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2023.12.003


561 Inagaki, H., Hayashi, K., Takaoka, Y., Ito, H., Fukumoto, Y., Yajima-Nakagawa, A., Chen, X., Shimosato

562 Nonaka, M., Hassett, E., Hatakeyama, K., Hirakuri, Y., Ishitsuka, M., Yumoto, E., Sakazawa, T.,


563 Asahina, M., Uchida, K., Okada, K., Yamane, H., Ueda, M., Miyamoto, K., 2023. Genome editing


564 reveals both the crucial role of OsCOI2 in jasmonate signaling and the functional diversity of COI1


22


&#91;bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.761194; this version posted November 2, 2026. The copyright holder for this&#93;(https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.761194)

preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
&#91;perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.&#93;(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)


565 homologs in rice. Plant Cell Physiol. 64, 405–421. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcac166


566 Ishikawa, K., Yamamura, C., Miyamoto, K., Kanda, Y., Inoue, H., Okada, K., Kamakura, T., Mori, M., 2024.


567 Rice transcription factor DPF regulates stress-induced biosynthesis of diterpenoid phytoalexins.


568 Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 88, 1344–1348. https://doi.org/10.1093/bbb/zbae118


569 Jikumaru, Y., Asami, T., Seto, H., Yoshida, S., Yokoyama, T., Obara, N., Hasegawa, M., Kodama, O.,


570 Nishiyama, M., Okada, K., Nojiri, H., Yamane, H., 2004. Preparation and biological activity of


571 molecular probes to identify and analyze jasmonic acid-binding proteins. Biosci. Biotechnol.


572 Biochem. 68, 1461–1466. https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb.68.1461


573 Kangasjärvi, S., Neukermans, J., Li, S., Aro, E.-M., Noctor, G., 2012. Photosynthesis, photorespiration, and


574 light signalling in defence responses. J. Exp. Bot. 63, 1619–1636. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/err402


575 Lahari, Z., van Boerdonk, S., Omoboye, O.O., Reichelt, M., Höfte, M., Gershenzon, J., Gheysen, G., Ullah, C.,


576 2024. Strigolactone deficiency induces jasmonate, sugar and flavonoid phytoalexin accumulation


577 enhancing rice defense against the blast fungus Pyricularia oryzae. New Phytol. 241, 827–844.


578 https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.19354


579 Lu, X., Zhang, J., Brown, B., Li, R., Rodríguez-Romero, J., Berasategui, A., Liu, B., Xu, M., Luo, D., Pan, Z.,


580 Baerson, S.R., Gershenzon, J., Li, Z., Sesma, A., Yang, B., Peters, R.J., 2018. Inferring roles in


581 defense from metabolic allocation of rice diterpenoids. Plant Cell 30, 1119–1131.


582 https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.18.00205


583 Margalha, L., Confraria, A., Baena-González, E., 2019. SnRK1 and TOR: modulating growth-defense trade

584 offs in plant stress responses. J. Exp. Bot. 70, 2261–2274. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erz066


585 Miyamoto, K., 2026. Regulatory mechanisms and evolutionary insights of phytoalexin biosynthesis in rice.


586 Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 90, 158–165. https://doi.org/10.1093/bbb/zbaf166


587 Miyamoto, K., Enda, I., Okada, T., Sato, Y., Watanabe, K., Sakazawa, T., Yumoto, E., Shibata, K., Asahina,


588 M., Iino, M., Yokota, T., Okada, K., Yamane, H., 2016. Jasmonoyl-l-isoleucine is required for the


589 production of a flavonoid phytoalexin but not diterpenoid phytoalexins in ultraviolet-irradiated rice


590 leaves. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 80, 1934–1938. https://doi.org/10.1080/09168451.2016.1189319


591 Nishimura, A., Yoshioka, A., Kariya, K., Ube, N., Ueno, K., Tebayashi, S.-I., Osaki-Oka, K., Ishihara, A.,


23


&#91;bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.761194; this version posted November 2, 2026. The copyright holder for this&#93;(https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.761194)

preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
&#91;perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.&#93;(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)


592 2021. Sugars in an aqueous extract of the spent substrate of the mushroom Hypsizygus marmoreus


593 induce defense responses in rice. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 85, 743–755.


594 https://doi.org/10.1093/bbb/zbaa122


595 Ogawa, S., Miyamoto, K., Nemoto, K., Sawasaki, T., Yamane, H., Nojiri, H., Okada, K., 2017. OsMYC2, an


596 essential factor for JA-inductive sakuranetin production in rice, interacts with MYC2-like proteins that


597 enhance its transactivation ability. Sci. Rep. 7, 40175. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep40175


598 Okada, A., Shimizu, T., Okada, K., Kuzuyama, T., Koga, J., Shibuya, N., Nojiri, H., Yamane, H., 2007.


599 Elicitor induced activation of the methylerythritol phosphate pathway toward phytoalexins


600 biosynthesis in rice. Plant Mol. Biol. 65, 177–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-007-9207-2


601 Rakwal, R., Tamogami, S., Kodama, O., 1996. Role of jasmonic acid as a signaling molecule in copper


602 chloride-elicited rice phytoalexin production. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 60, 1046–1048.


603 https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb.60.1046


604 Riemann, M., Haga, K., Shimizu, T., Okada, K., Ando, S., Mochizuki, S., Nishizawa, Y., Yamanouchi, U.,


605 Nick, P., Yano, M., Minami, E., Takano, M., Yamane, H., Iino, M., 2013. Identification of rice Allene


606 Oxide Cyclase mutants and the function of jasmonate for defence against Magnaporthe oryzae. Plant


607 J. 74, 226–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.12115


608 Sano, S., Aoyama, M., Nakai, K., Shimotani, K., Yamasaki, K., Sato, M.H., Tojo, D., Suwastika, I.N.,


609 Nomura, H., Shiina, T., 2014. Light-dependent expression of flg22-induced defense genes in


610 Arabidopsis. Front. Plant Sci. 5, 531. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00531


611 Shimizu, T., Lin, F., Hasegawa, M., Okada, K., Nojiri, H., Yamane, H., 2012. Purification and identification of


612 naringenin 7-O-methyltransferase, a key enzyme in biosynthesis of flavonoid phytoalexin sakuranetin


613 in rice. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 19315–19325. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M112.351270


614 Shimizu, T., Miyamoto, K., Miyamoto, K., Minami, E., Nishizawa, Y., Iino, M., Nojiri, H., Yamane, H.,


615 Okada, K., 2013. OsJAR1 contributes mainly to biosynthesis of the stress-induced jasmonoyl

616 isoleucine involved in defense responses in rice. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 77, 1556–1564.


617 https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb.130272


618 Smith, A.M., Stitt, M., 2007. Coordination of carbon supply and plant growth. Plant Cell Environ. 30, 1126–


24


&#91;bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.761194; this version posted November 2, 2026. The copyright holder for this&#93;(https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.761194)

preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
&#91;perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.&#93;(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)


619 1149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01708.x


620 Toyomasu, T., Usui, M., Sugawara, C., Otomo, K., Hirose, Y., Miyao, A., Hirochika, H., Okada, K., Shimizu,


621 T., Koga, J., Hasegawa, M., Chuba, M., Kawana, Y., Kuroda, M., Minami, E., Mitsuhashi, W.,


622 Yamane, H., 2014. Reverse-genetic approach to verify physiological roles of rice phytoalexins:


623 characterization of a knockdown mutant of OsCPS4 phytoalexin biosynthetic gene in rice. Physiol.


624 Plant. 150, 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.12066


625 Tun, W., Yoon, J., Vo, K.T.X., Cho, L.-H., Hoang, T.V., Peng, X., Kim, E.-J., Win, K.T.Y.S., Lee, S.-W.,


626 Jung, K.-H., Jeon, J.-S., An, G., 2023. Sucrose preferentially promotes expression of OsWRKY7 and


627 OsPR10a to enhance defense response to blast fungus in rice. Front. Plant Sci. 14, 1117023.


628 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1117023


629 Ueno, M., Kihara, J., Arase, S., 2015. Tryptamine and sakuranetin accumulation in Sekiguchi lesions


630 associated with the light-enhanced resistance of the lesion mimic mutant of rice to Magnaporthe


631 oryzae. J. Gen. Plant Pathol. 81, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10327-014-0560-0


632 Valletta, A., Iozia, L.M., Fattorini, L., Leonelli, F., 2023. Rice phytoalexins: Half a century of amazing


633 discoveries; Part I: Distribution, biosynthesis, chemical synthesis, and biological activities. Plants 12,


634 260. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12020260


635 Vranová, E., Coman, D., Gruissem, W., 2013. Network analysis of the MVA and MEP pathways for


636 isoprenoid synthesis. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 64, 665–700. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant

637 050312-120116


638 Weber, A.P.M., Linka, N., 2011. Connecting the plastid: transporters of the plastid envelope and their role in


639 linking plastidial with cytosolic metabolism. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 62, 53–77.


640 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042110-103903


641 Xie, X.-Z., Xue, Y.-J., Zhou, J.-J., Zhang, B., Chang, H., Takano, M., 2011. Phytochromes regulate SA and JA


642 signaling pathways in rice and are required for developmentally controlled resistance to Magnaporthe


643 grisea. Mol. Plant 4, 688–696. https://doi.org/10.1093/mp/ssr005


644 Yamada, K., Mine, A., 2024. Sugar coordinates plant defense signaling. Sci. Adv. 10, eadk4131.


645 https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adk4131


25


&#91;bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.761194; this version posted November 2, 2026. The copyright holder for this&#93;(https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.761194)

preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
&#91;perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.&#93;(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)


646 Yamamura, C., Mizutani, E., Okada, K., Nakagawa, H., Fukushima, S., Tanaka, A., Maeda, S., Kamakura, T.,


647 Yamane, H., Takatsuji, H., Mori, M., 2015. Diterpenoid phytoalexin factor, a bHLH transcription


648 factor, plays a central role in the biosynthesis of diterpenoid phytoalexins in rice. Plant J. 84, 1100–


649 1113. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.13065


650 Yamane, H., 2013. Biosynthesis of phytoalexins and regulatory mechanisms of it in rice. Biosci. Biotechnol.


651 Biochem. 77, 1141–1148. https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb.130109


652


26


&#91;bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.761194; this version posted November 2, 2026. The copyright holder for this&#93;(https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.761194)

preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
&#91;perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.&#93;(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)


653 **Figure legends**


654 **Fig. 1.** CuCl 2 -induced phytoalexin accumulation was suppressed under dark conditions.


655 Leaf disks prepared from the leaf blades of rice ( _Oryza sativa_ L. ‘Nihonmasari’) were incubated under


656 continuous white light or in darkness from the time of preparation, and 1 mM CuCl 2 was applied 24 h later (0


657 h). Samples were collected at 0, 6, 24, 48, and 72 h after CuCl 2 application. "Initial" refers to the sample


658 collected at the time of leaf-disk preparation, before the light and dark treatments were started, and is common


659 to both treatments. (A) Experimental design. (B) Phytocassanes. (C) Momilactones. (D) Sakuranetin. *, _p_ &lt;


660 0.05; Welch’s t-test with Bonferroni correction. Values are means ± SE ( _n_ = 6).


661 n.d., not detected; time points at which the compound was not detected in both treatments were excluded from


662 the analysis.


663


664 **Fig. 2.** CuCl 2 -induced expression of genes relevant to phytoalexin production was suppressed under dark


665 conditions.


666 Leaf disks prepared from the leaf blades of rice ( _O. sativa_ L. ‘Nihonmasari’) were incubated under white light


667 or in darkness from the time of preparation, and 1 mM CuCl 2 was applied 24 h later (0 h). Transcript levels


668 were determined by quantitative RT-PCR and normalized to _OsUBQ_ . (A) _OsCPS2_ . (B) _OsKSL7_ . (C) _OsCPS4_ .


669 (D) _OsKSL4_ . (E) _OsDXS3_ . (F) _OsNOMT_ . Samples were collected at 0, 6, 12, and 24 h after CuCl 2 application.


670 "Initial" indicates the sample collected at the time of leaf-disk preparation, before the light and dark treatments


671 were started, and is common to both treatments; all values are expressed relative to this sample (Initial = 1).


672 Note that the y axis in (F) is scaled by × 10 &#91;4&#93; . Values are means ± SE ( _n_ = 3). *, _p_ &lt; 0.05; Welch’s t-test with


673 Bonferroni correction.


674


675 **Fig. 3.** Dark treatment decreased endogenous soluble sugars without a detectable decrease in early CuCl 2 

676 induced jasmonate accumulation.


677 (A–C) Leaf disks prepared from the leaf blades of rice ( _O. sativa_ L. ‘Nihonmasari’) were incubated under


678 white light or in darkness from the time of preparation, and 1 mM CuCl 2 was applied 24 h later (0 h). Samples


679 were collected at 0, 6, 12, and 24 h after CuCl 2 application. "Initial" indicates the sample collected at the time


27


&#91;bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.761194; this version posted November 2, 2026. The copyright holder for this&#93;(https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.761194)

preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
&#91;perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.&#93;(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)


680 of leaf-disk preparation, before the light and dark treatments were started, and is common to both treatments.


681 (A) Sucrose. (B) Glucose. (C) Fructose. *, _p_ &lt; 0.05; Welch’s t-test with Bonferroni correction. Values are


682 means ± SE ( _n_ = 3).


683 (D, E) Leaf segments (approximately 1 cm long) prepared from the leaf blades of rice ( _O. sativa_ L.


684 ‘Nihonmasari’) were incubated under white light or in darkness from the time of preparation, and 1 mM CuCl 2


685 was applied 24 h later (0 h). Samples were collected at 0 and 2 h after CuCl 2 application. (D) Jasmonic acid.


686 (E) Jasmonoyl- L -isoleucine. n.s., not significant (Welch’s t-test with Bonferroni correction). Values are means


687 ± SE ( _n_ = 3).


688


689 **Fig. 4.** Sucrose application restored CuCl 2 -induced phytoalexin production under dark conditions.


690 Leaf disks prepared from the leaf blades of rice ( _O. sativa_ L. ‘Nihonmasari’) were incubated under white light


691 or in darkness from the time of preparation, and 1 mM CuCl 2 was applied 24 h later, either alone or together


692 with sucrose (Suc; 3, 30, or 300 mM). (A–C) Phytoalexin levels 72 h after CuCl 2 application: (A)


693 phytocassanes, (B) momilactones, (C) sakuranetin. (D–I) Transcript levels 24 h after CuCl 2 application,


694 determined by quantitative RT-PCR, normalized to _OsUBQ_ and expressed relative to the mean of the light


695 control (Light Control = 1; note that Fig. 2 is expressed relative to the Initial sample): (D) _OsCPS2_ . (E)


696 _OsKSL7_ . (F) _OsCPS4_ . (G) _OsKSL4_ . (H) _OsDXS3_ . (I) _OsNOMT_ . Values are means ± SE ( _n_ = 6 for


697 phytoalexins and _n_ = 3 for transcripts). Different letters indicate significant differences ( _p_ &lt; 0.05; one-way


698 ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD test on log(x + 1)-transformed values for phytoalexins and on Δ _Ct_ values


699 for transcripts). n.d., not detected; these treatments were included in the analysis as zero values.


700


701 **Fig. 5.** Mannitol did not substitute for sucrose in restoring CuCl 2 -induced phytoalexin production under dark


702 conditions (A–C), nor did 2-deoxy- D -glucose substitute for glucose (D–F), indicating that a metabolizable


703 sugar is required.


704 (A–C) Leaf disks prepared from the leaf blades of rice ( _O. sativa_ L. ‘Nihonmasari’) were incubated under


705 white light or in darkness from the time of preparation. In darkness, 300 mM sucrose (Suc) or mannitol (Man)


706 was applied 24 h later, with or without 1 mM CuCl 2, and phytoalexins were quantified 72 h thereafter. (A)


28


&#91;bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.761194; this version posted November 2, 2026. The copyright holder for this&#93;(https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.761194)

preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in
&#91;perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.&#93;(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)


707 Phytocassanes. (B) Momilactones. (C) Sakuranetin.


708 (D–F) Leaf disks prepared from rice ( _O. sativa_ L. ‘Nipponbare’) were treated as in (A–C), except that 300 mM


709 glucose (Glc) or 2-deoxy- D -glucose (2-DG) was applied with 1 mM CuCl 2 in darkness. (D) Phytocassanes. (E)


710 Momilactones. (F) Sakuranetin. (A–C) and (D–F) are independent experiments performed with different


711 cultivars; absolute values should not be compared across the two sets of panels. Values are means ± SE ( _n_ = 6).


712 Different letters indicate significant differences ( _p_ &lt; 0.05; one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD test on


713 log(x + 1)-transformed values). n.d., not detected; these treatments were included in the analysis as zero


714 values.


715


716 **Fig. 6. DCMU and high concentrations of 2-DG suppressed CuCl** **2** **-induced phytoalexin production in**


717 **the light.**


718 (A–C) Leaf disks prepared from the leaf blades of rice ( _O. sativa_ L. ‘Nihonmasari’) were preincubated with


719 0.1% ethanol (control) or 10 µM DCMU under white light for 24 h, and then incubated in the same solution


720 with or without 1 mM CuCl 2 for 24 h. Endogenous levels of (A) sucrose, (B) glucose, and (C) fructose.


721 (D–F) Leaf disks were preincubated as in (A–C) and then incubated with or without 1 mM CuCl 2, with or


722 without 300 mM sucrose, for 72 h. (D) Phytocassanes. (E) Momilactones. (F) Sakuranetin. (G–I) Leaf disks


723 prepared from rice ( _O. sativa_ L. ‘Nipponbare’) were preincubated under white light for 24 h and then


724 incubated with 1 mM CuCl 2 together with glucose (Glc) or 2-deoxy- D -glucose (2-DG) at 3, 30, or 300 mM for


725 72 h. (G) Phytocassanes. (H) Momilactones. (I) Sakuranetin.


726 Values are means ± SE ( _n_ = 3 for A–C and _n_ = 6 for D–I). Different letters indicate significant differences ( _p_ &lt;


727 0.05; one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD test on log(x + 1)-transformed values). n.d., not detected;


728 these treatments were included in the analysis as zero values.


729


730 **Supplementary material**


731 Table S1. Primers used for quantitative RT-PCR.


732 Table S2. Results of statistical analyses.


733


29


A



Leaf disks
preparation





CuCl 2 application



B


C


D



30


20


10











0





Initial 0 24 48 72

Time (h) after CuCl 2 application


150



100


50


0













Initial 0 24 48 72

Time (h) after CuCl 2 application



2000 Sakuranetin


1500


1000







500


0









Initial 0 24 48 72

Time (h) after CuCl 2 application


Figure 1


A



B



_OsCPS2_
50



40


30


20


10


0







_OsKSL7_
15000


10000


5000









Initial 0 12 24

Time (h) after CuCl 2 application


C D


_OsCPS4_
500



0

Initial 0 12 24

Time (h) after CuCl 2 application


_OsKSL4_
3000



400


300


200


100













0

Initial 0 12 24

Time (h) after CuCl 2 application


E F


_OsDXS3_
20



2000


1000


0





Initial 0 12 24

Time (h) after CuCl 2 application


_OsNOMT_
20











15


10


5


0







15


10


5


0





Initial 0 12 24

Time (h) after CuCl 2 application



Initial 0 12 24

Time (h) after CuCl 2 application



Figure 2


A



50 Sucrose



5 Glucose



B



40


30


20













10


0

Initial 0 12 24

Time (h) after CuCl 2 application


C D



4


3


2


1


0



Initial 0 12 24

Time (h) after CuCl 2 application


E

Jasmonic acid Jasmonoyl-isoleucine

n.s.





5 Fructose



4


3


2


1


0











1.0


0.8


0.6


0.4


0.2


0





Initial 0 12 24

Time (h) after CuCl 2 application



1.0


0.8


0.6


0.4


0.2


0


Figure 3






A



B C



250


200


150


100


50


0



Phytocassanes Momilactones Sakuranetin



400











0









2500


2000


1500


1000


500



















300


200


100


0



n.d. c c n.d.





D



E




|Phytocassanes|Col2|Col3|
|---|---|---|
|bc&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;d&lt;br&gt;d&lt;br&gt;cd&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;n.d.|bc&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;d&lt;br&gt;d&lt;br&gt;cd&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;n.d.|bc&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;d&lt;br&gt;d&lt;br&gt;cd&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;n.d.|
|0&lt;br&gt;0|0&lt;br&gt;1|0&lt;br&gt;0&lt;br&gt;3&lt;br&gt;30&lt;br&gt;300&lt;br&gt;0&lt;br&gt;1&lt;br&gt;1&lt;br&gt;1&lt;br&gt;1&lt;br&gt;Dark|
|Light|Light|Light|


|Momilactones|Col2|Col3|
|---|---|---|
|n.d.&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;a|n.d.&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;a|n.d.&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;a|
|0&lt;br&gt;0|0&lt;br&gt;1|0&lt;br&gt;0&lt;br&gt;3&lt;br&gt;30&lt;br&gt;300&lt;br&gt;0&lt;br&gt;1&lt;br&gt;1&lt;br&gt;1&lt;br&gt;1&lt;br&gt;Dark|
|Light|Light|Light|


|Sakuranetin a|Col2|Col3|
|---|---|---|
|n.d.&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;d&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;a|n.d.&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;d&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;a|n.d.&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;d&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;a|
|n.d.&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;d&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;a|n.d.&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;d&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;a||
|0&lt;br&gt;0|0&lt;br&gt;0&lt;br&gt;3&lt;br&gt;30&lt;br&gt;300&lt;br&gt;0&lt;br&gt;1&lt;br&gt;1&lt;br&gt;1&lt;br&gt;1&lt;br&gt;Dark|0&lt;br&gt;0&lt;br&gt;3&lt;br&gt;30&lt;br&gt;300&lt;br&gt;0&lt;br&gt;1&lt;br&gt;1&lt;br&gt;1&lt;br&gt;1&lt;br&gt;Dark|



F



4000





3000


2000





3000


2000


1000









200


150


100


50



















0





1000


0



0


|OsCPS2 a|Col2|Col3|
|---|---|---|
|d&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;c|d&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;c|d&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;c|
|0&lt;br&gt;0|0&lt;br&gt;1|0&lt;br&gt;0&lt;br&gt;300&lt;br&gt;300&lt;br&gt;0&lt;br&gt;1&lt;br&gt;1&lt;br&gt;0&lt;br&gt;Dark|
|Light|Light|Light|


|OsKSL7 a|Col2|Col3|
|---|---|---|
|e&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;d&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;a|e&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;d&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;a|e&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;d&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;a|
|0&lt;br&gt;0|0&lt;br&gt;1|0&lt;br&gt;0&lt;br&gt;300&lt;br&gt;300&lt;br&gt;0&lt;br&gt;1&lt;br&gt;1&lt;br&gt;0&lt;br&gt;Dark|
|Light|Light|Light|


|OsCPS4 a|Col2|Col3|
|---|---|---|
|d&lt;br&gt;ab&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;a|d&lt;br&gt;ab&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;a|d&lt;br&gt;ab&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;a|
|0&lt;br&gt;0|0&lt;br&gt;1|0&lt;br&gt;0&lt;br&gt;300&lt;br&gt;300&lt;br&gt;0&lt;br&gt;1&lt;br&gt;1&lt;br&gt;0&lt;br&gt;Dark|
|Light|Light|Light|



G H I

_OsKSL4_ _OsDXS3_



1000







2500





2000


1500


1000


500







1500


1000


500









800


600


400


200



















0



0

|OsDXS3 a|Col2|Col3|
|---|---|---|
|c&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;a|c&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;a|c&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;a|
|0&lt;br&gt;0|0&lt;br&gt;1|0&lt;br&gt;0&lt;br&gt;300&lt;br&gt;300&lt;br&gt;0&lt;br&gt;1&lt;br&gt;1&lt;br&gt;0&lt;br&gt;Dark|
|Light|Light|Light|



Figure 4



0


|OsKSL4 a|Col2|Col3|
|---|---|---|
|c&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;a|c&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;a|c&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;a|
|0&lt;br&gt;0|0&lt;br&gt;1|0&lt;br&gt;0&lt;br&gt;300&lt;br&gt;300&lt;br&gt;0&lt;br&gt;1&lt;br&gt;1&lt;br&gt;0&lt;br&gt;Dark|
|Light|Light|Light|


|OsNOMT a|Col2|Col3|
|---|---|---|
|d&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;e&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;a|d&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;e&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;a|d&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;e&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;a|
|d&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;e&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;a|||
|0&lt;br&gt;0&lt;br&gt;0&lt;br&gt;1&lt;br&gt;Light|0&lt;br&gt;1|0&lt;br&gt;0&lt;br&gt;300&lt;br&gt;300&lt;br&gt;0&lt;br&gt;1&lt;br&gt;1&lt;br&gt;0&lt;br&gt;Dark|


4000

3000

2000

0



A


D


|Phytocassanes a|Col2|Col3|
|---|---|---|
|bc&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;n.d.&lt;br&gt;n.d.&lt;br&gt;bc&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;bc&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;b|bc&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;n.d.&lt;br&gt;n.d.&lt;br&gt;bc&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;bc&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;b|bc&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;n.d.&lt;br&gt;n.d.&lt;br&gt;bc&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;bc&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;b|
|-&lt;br&gt;0|-&lt;br&gt;1|-&lt;br&gt;Suc Man&lt;br&gt;-&lt;br&gt;Suc&lt;br&gt;0&lt;br&gt;0&lt;br&gt;1&lt;br&gt;0&lt;br&gt;1&lt;br&gt;Dark&lt;br&gt;Man&lt;br&gt;1|
|Light|Light|Light|


|Momilactones|Col2|Col3|
|---|---|---|
|bc&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;bc&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;b|bc&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;bc&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;b|bc&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;bc&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;b|
|-&lt;br&gt;0|-&lt;br&gt;1|-&lt;br&gt;Suc Man&lt;br&gt;-&lt;br&gt;Suc&lt;br&gt;0&lt;br&gt;0&lt;br&gt;1&lt;br&gt;0&lt;br&gt;1&lt;br&gt;Dark&lt;br&gt;Man&lt;br&gt;1|
|Light|Light|Light|


|Sakuranetin a|Col2|Col3|
|---|---|---|
|n.d.&lt;br&gt;n.d.&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;b|n.d.&lt;br&gt;n.d.&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;b|n.d.&lt;br&gt;n.d.&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;b|
|-&lt;br&gt;0|-&lt;br&gt;1|-&lt;br&gt;Suc Man&lt;br&gt;-&lt;br&gt;Suc&lt;br&gt;0&lt;br&gt;0&lt;br&gt;1&lt;br&gt;0&lt;br&gt;1&lt;br&gt;Dark&lt;br&gt;Man&lt;br&gt;1|
|Light|Light|Light|



100

60

40

0



500

300

200

0

























b c







bc n.d.c bc b 100 bc c bc c b b 1000 c n.d. c n.d.



100 bc









500

300

200

0







CuCl 2

&#91;(mM)&#93;





1 CuCl 2

&#91;(mM)&#93;



E F





1 CuCl 2

&#91;(mM)&#93;







400





3000


2000


1000





n.d.d c n.d.d b n.d.d 100 e c d b n.d.e 1000 n.d.e







300


200


100





n.d. c n.d. n.d. e c n.d. n.d. c d







|Momilactones a|Col2|Col3|
|---|---|---|
|e&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;d&lt;br&gt;e&lt;br&gt;n.d.|e&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;d&lt;br&gt;e&lt;br&gt;n.d.|e&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;d&lt;br&gt;e&lt;br&gt;n.d.|
|-&lt;br&gt;0|-&lt;br&gt;1|-&lt;br&gt;-&lt;br&gt;Glc&lt;br&gt;2-DG&lt;br&gt;0&lt;br&gt;1&lt;br&gt;1&lt;br&gt;1&lt;br&gt;Dark|
|Light|Light|Light|


Figure 5







0



0



CuCl 2

&#91;(mM)&#93;





CuCl 2

&#91;(mM)&#93;



CuCl &#91;(mM)&#93; 2


|Phytocassanes|Col2|Col3|
|---|---|---|
|n.d.&lt;br&gt;n.d.&lt;br&gt;d&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;d&lt;br&gt;d&lt;br&gt;n.d.|n.d.&lt;br&gt;n.d.&lt;br&gt;d&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;d&lt;br&gt;d&lt;br&gt;n.d.|n.d.&lt;br&gt;n.d.&lt;br&gt;d&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;d&lt;br&gt;d&lt;br&gt;n.d.|
|-&lt;br&gt;0|-&lt;br&gt;1|-&lt;br&gt;-&lt;br&gt;Glc&lt;br&gt;2-DG&lt;br&gt;0&lt;br&gt;1&lt;br&gt;1&lt;br&gt;1&lt;br&gt;Dark|
|Light|Light|Light|


|Sakuranetin a|Col2|Col3|
|---|---|---|
|n.d.&lt;br&gt;e&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;d|n.d.&lt;br&gt;e&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;d|n.d.&lt;br&gt;e&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;d|
|n.d.&lt;br&gt;e&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;d|||
|-&lt;br&gt;0|-&lt;br&gt;1|-&lt;br&gt;-&lt;br&gt;Glc&lt;br&gt;2-DG&lt;br&gt;0&lt;br&gt;1&lt;br&gt;1&lt;br&gt;1&lt;br&gt;Dark|
|Light|Light|Light|


A B C D



100 &#91;Phytocassanes&#93;



Sucrose
50

40

30

20

0



a













1





Glucose
1 a

0.8

0.4





0

CuCl 2 (mM) 0 1 0 1



80


60


40


20





Fructose
1

0.6 a

0.4







0 1 0 1 CuCl 2 (mM) 0 1 0 1


Control 10 μM DCMU Control 10 μM DCMU



0 1 0 1 CuCl 2 (mM) 0 1 0 1


Control 10 μM DCMU Control 10 µM DCMU



Control 10 µM DCMU



Suc (mM) 0 0 0 0 300


Control 10 µM DCMU



200 Phytocassanes





Sakuranetin
2000

1600

1200

800



G



150


100


50



40

30 b

20





a

















n.d. n.d.



0 0

|Momilactones 0 1 0 1 Control 10 μM DCMU a a|Col2|
|---|---|
|n.d.&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;bc|n.d.&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;bc|
|n.d.&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;a&lt;br&gt;b&lt;br&gt;c&lt;br&gt;bc||
|||


0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0



2 (mM) 0 1 0 1 1

Suc (mM) 0 0 0 0 300



CuCl 2 (mM) 0 1 0 1



1



CuCl 2 (mM) 0 1 0 1



Control 1 mM CuCl 2


Sakuranetin



Glc Glc Glc 2-DG 2-DG 2-DG

0 0

3 30 300 3 30 300



Glc



Glc Glc 2-DG 2-DG 2-DG
3 30 300 3 30 300 (mM)



Control 10 μM DCMU



Suc (mM) 0 0 0 0 300


Control 10 μM DCMU



H I



Momilactones
100 ab a

80

60

40

20

0



ab ab



a











1500


1000


500


0





Glc Glc Glc 2-DG 2-DG 2-DG

0 0

3 30 300 3 30 300



Glc



Glc Glc 2-DG 2-DG 2-DG
3 30 300 3 30 300 (mM)



Glc Glc Glc 2-DG 2-DG 2-DG

0 0

3 30 300 3 30 300



Glc



Glc Glc 2-DG 2-DG 2-DG
3 30 300 3 30 300 (mM)



Control 1 mM CuCl 2



Control 1 mM CuCl 2



Figure 6


